Publications
Mapping exposures of EU banks to the global shadow banking system
(w/ M. D’Errico, N. Killeen, V. Luz, T. Peltonen, R. Portes and T. Urbano)
Journal of Banking and Finance, Volume 134, January 2022, Article 106168.
Abstract
Other versions
Media
This paper provides a unique snapshot of the asset exposures of EU banks to shadow banking entities within the global financial system. Drawing on a rich and novel dataset, we show that 60% of the EU banks’ exposures are towards non-EU entities, particularly US-domiciled shadow banking entities. We assess the degree of concentration across different types of shadow banking counterparties. We show that while banks’ exposures are diversified at the individual level, this diversification leads to high overlap across different types of shadow banking entities, with consequent systemic risk. We also examine how bank- and country-level characteristics relate to the exposures of EU banks to shadow banking entities. Our results emphasise the importance of monitoring these cross-border and cross-sector exposures and closing remaining data gaps.
Working papers
A macroeconomic model of banks’ endogenous systemic risk taking
(w/ D. Martinez-Miera and J. Suarez)
Submitted.
Abstract
Other versions
We study banks’ systemic risk-taking decisions in a dynamic general equilibrium model, highlighting the macroprudential role of bank capital requirements. Banks decide on their unobservable exposure to systemic shocks by balancing risk-shifting gains against the value of preserving their capital after such shocks. Capital requirements reduce systemic risk taking, but at the cost of reducing credit and output in calm times, generating welfare trade-offs. We find that systemic risk taking is maximal after long periods of calm and may worsen if capital requirements are countercyclically adjusted. Removing deposit insurance introduces market discipline but increases the bank capital necessary to support credit, implies lower (though far from zero) optimal capital requirements and has nuanced social welfare effects.
CBDC and the operational framework of monetary policy
(w/ G. Nuño and C. Thomas)
Revise and resubmit,
Journal of Monetary Economics.
Abstract
Other versions
Media
We analyse the impact of introducing a central bank-issued digital currency (CBDC) on the operational framework of monetary policy and the macroeconomy as a whole. To this end, we develop a New Keynesian model with heterogeneous banks, a frictional interbank market, a central bank with deposit and lending facilities, and household preferences for different liquid assets. The model is calibrated to replicate the main monetary and financial aggregates in the euro area. Our analysis predicts that CBDC adoption implies a roughly equivalent reduction in banks’ deposit funding. However, this ‘deposit crunch’ has a rather small effect on bank lending to the real economy, and hence on aggregate investment and GDP. This result reflects the parallel impact of a CBDC on a central bank’s operational framework. For relatively moderate CBDC adoption levels, the reduction in deposits is absorbed by an almost one-to-one fall in reserves at the central bank, implying a transition from a ‘floor’ system – with ample reserves – to a ‘corridor’ system. For larger CBDC adoption, the loss of bank deposits is compensated by increased recourse to central bank credit, as the corridor system gives way to a ‘ceiling’ system with scarce reserves.
Breaking the Sovereign-Bank Nexus
Reject and resubmit,
Review of Economic Studies.
Abstract
Other versions
Awards
This paper develops a quantitative dynamic general equilibrium model that features endogenous bank failure and sovereign default risk. It studies the feedback loop between sovereign and banking crises, and evaluates the effectiveness of bank capital regulation in addressing it. In the model, bank failure contributes to an increase of sovereign default risk through the government bailout of bank creditors. Meanwhile, holding high-yield risky sovereign bonds may be attractive to banks protected by limited liability. By increasing banks' failure risk and their funding costs, sovereign exposures hurt bank lending and contribute to further contractions in aggregate economic activity. Capital requirements shape banks' incentives to invest in sovereign debt. More stringent capital regulation makes banks safer, weakening the sovereign-bank nexus. This comes at the cost of constraining the overall supply of credit.
The procyclicality of expected credit loss provisions
(w/ J. Suarez)
Revise and resubmit,
Review of Corporate Finance Studies.
Abstract
Other versions
Media
The Great Recession has pushed accounting standards for banks' loan loss provisioning to shift from an incurred loss approach to an expected credit loss approach. IFRS 9 and the incoming update of US GAAP imply a more timely recognition of credit losses but also greater responsiveness to changes in aggregate conditions, which raises procyclicality concerns. This paper develops and calibrates a recursive ratings-migration model to assess the impact of different provisioning approaches on the cyclicality of banks' profits and regulatory capital. The model is used to analyze the effectiveness of potential policy responses to the procyclicality problem.
